Found this writing from GEORGE Romney - Mitt’s Dad. Condensed from an address to the Commonwealth Club of California.
George Romney - President of American Motors Corp. - Reader’s Digest, May 1960
Some years ago, Justice Louis Brandeis declared, “It is not good for us that we should ever lose the fighting quality, the stamina and the courage to battle for what we want when we are entitled to it.”
Today, I think we have lost a great deal of that “fighting quality.” The majority of our people have few flaming interests that they are willing to struggle for. In larger and larger numbers, the individual is being engulfed in vast power groups. In politics, he is renouncing direct, active participation and transferring his rights of citizenship to the corporation or the union, which concerns itself with his economic interest. This substitution of economic for political citizenship could be the doom of our way of life.
The rights of citizenship must be exercised by individuals - not by big labor, big business or big government.
In the American Revolution, we fought against the power concentration that made our liberty and independence impossible. The weak state of the original Confederation reflected the people’s fear of concentrated authority. The Constitution itself, while providing for a strong central government, bristles with safeguards against excessive power held in the hands of a few. Jefferson’s theory of democracy defeated Hamilton and his ideas of a dominant federal government; Jackson defeated the Bank of the United States; Franklin Roosevelt divided the power of the big finance and big business - in part curbing the power of the business barons, but also helping create barons of unionism. This whole problem of concentrated power we are ignoring today.
Any time we permit a few men in labor or a few men in industry to reach the point where they can shut down a basic industry, cripple the economy and adversely affect the public interest - as in last year’s steel strike - we have a condition completely contrary to the spirit of America. I think that is an excessive concentration of private economic power. I am not seeking increased government regulation. Quite the contrary. But we do need to modernize our vague, outmoded inconsistent labor laws and anti-trust laws, which at present permit or foster labor monopolies and massive coalitions of industrial power. For it is the collision between these two excessive forces that is confronting us with the necessity for government intervention to protect the people - and the end result of that will be some form of totalitarianism.
Concentration of power ought to be fought wherever it exists, or the individual will be smashed. And that includes concentration in the form of a highly centralized government. Certainly big societies, especially those in competition with other big societies, need strong (even big) unions and corporations. But their power can and must be dispersed, with the ultimate control in the hands of the people. This will be impossible unless we recognize that it is morally wrong for either unions or corporations to get into politics.
There is little difference in principle between the present excessive political influence of unions and the earlier excessive political influence of business. One is as wrong as the other. Both are obstacles to political freedom, economic justice and individual rights. I believe we must prohibit business organizations and unions from political activity and expenditures, direct or indirect. What right have they to use the funds of stockholders or members to support specific candidates or issues? What right has either to create an atmosphere wherein a member’s or employee’s economic status can possibly be thought to depend on his political views and convictions?
I believe that corporate officials and union officials should participate in political affairs - but personally, as individuals. They should take every possible step to assure members and employees that this is a personal right not to be abridged in any manner. Each individual must speak for himself, directed by what he believes in. Of course, to be effective he must combine his energies with the energies of others, but through the instrument of a political party, not through his corporation or his union.
Unfortunately, our political parties have allowed themselves, to a large extent, to become the captives of dominant economic groups. In Michigan, for example, one party is largely under the control of big labor, while the other is largely in the hands of big business.
To combat this, we are developing a nonpartisan citizens’ program identified as Citizens for Michigan, made up of individuals acting for themselves. We hope to create an influence greater than that of these minority economic groups. The success of our program can provide the basis for releasing the political parties from their captivity and restoring to the people these necessary instruments for self-government.
There are three important things we must do to stop the drift toward increasingly massive centralized government.
One, make certain, but modernized law, that power outside government is dispersed and dept dispersed, so that big government is not needed to hold it in check.
Two, improve the character of state governments and modernize the smaller governmental units, such as the parish or the county.
There, revive the feeling that people can participate effectively in control of the government. For greater exercise of citizenship is an essential factor in America’s future.
The most effective means of doing this would be for the political parties to reject economic power-group participation and reach out for the citizens. The give-a-dollar-to-the-party-of-your-choice campaigns would be more effective with a give-an-hour campaign. Widely publicized upon forum meetings would put excitement and opportunity back into the political arena at the local level; people are not going to participate if they have no opportunity to choose anything but the word that is passed from the smoke-filled room. We need to bring our political parties and the people together, if our democratic system is to continue to be truly representative.
Today, the individual citizen must fight for his citizenship, or he will find himself, enslaved by the power groups - or by an all-powerful stat that is exercising his inalienable rights on the premise that it must protect him from the excesses of the power groups. This is the age-old struggle to keep power in any form from becoming excessive. The American Revolution was not a distant explosion, from which the dust has long since settled. It is a continuing process, and we should never forget it.